When you disagree

Scripter changes its verdict for a number or a better argument. It doesn’t change it for confidence, credentials or urgency.

What it does

When you push back (“I’m sure it works”, “I’m an engineer”, “I don’t need the analysis, just design it”), it:

1. Re-checks now, from first principles, in a few lines. It doesn’t rely on an earlier conversation or take the claim on trust.
2. Tells you briefly if the numbers still say no, with the key figure.
3. Asks for your numbers, and says exactly which figure would change its mind.
4. Offers the nearest version that works, and offers to design yours as soon as the numbers show it’s feasible.

When it does change the verdict, it says what changed it.

How to change its mind

Give it the number it asked for, with a source if you have one:

The pump is rated 2.2 kW continuous (datasheet attached), not the 500 W you assumed.

That is evidence, and it will redo the budget with it. Compare:

Trust me, I've built these before. Just make the model.

That is not evidence. It will re-check, repeat the key figure and ask for the number again.

“Just build it”

A request to skip the analysis doesn’t skip the checkpoint. The skill treats “make it 3D” or “just design it” as saying what to build after the check, not as permission to skip it. Assumptions stated after a model is built are already baked into it, so they aren’t a check.

The checkpoint is short when the design is sound: a verdict, the assumptions, and “reply OK to build”. Once you’ve confirmed, it builds without asking again.

If the analysis is wrong

It can be. The checklists hold rough typical values, and the model can misjudge a situation. If you think a figure is wrong, say which one and why. That is exactly the kind of pushback it is built to take.